9. President Hinckley’s Revelation and Recent Temple Building
Virginia Hatch Romney and Richard O. Cowan, The Colonia Juárez Temple: A Prophet’s Inspiration (Provo, UT: Religious Studies Center, Brigham Young University, 2009).
President Hinckley’s Revelation and Recent Temple Building
Chapter 1 briefly reviewed the course of Latter-day Saint temple building leading up to President Gordon B. Hinckley’s momentous revelation received at the time he participated in the Juárez Academy’s 1997 centennial celebration. Temples built earlier during that decade had ranged in size from about thirty-four thousand to seventy thousand square feet and had taken a long time to build. Since that time many small temples resembling the one in the Mormon colonies of northern Mexico have spread throughout the world from the prophet’s simple experience.
Small Temples Dot the Earth
A pebble dropped into a pond causes ripples which grow in size until they fill the entire surface of the water. President Hinckley’s inspiration while visiting the colonies in 1997 has had that same effect. Since that momentous occasion, over sixty of these small temples have been built, and they can now be found on every inhabited continent.
At the general conference of October 1997, when President Hinckley announced plans to build smaller temples, he suggested that initially they would be located in remote areas where “the membership is small and not likely to grow very much in the near future. Are those who live in these places to be denied forever the blessings of the temple ordinances?” The President answered this question by announcing, “We will construct small temples in some of these areas, buildings with all of the facilities to administer all of the ordinances” for the living as well as the dead. “We are determined, brethren, to take the temple to the people and afford them every opportunity for the very precious blessings that come of temple worship.”
Ground was broken for the first of the small temples at Monticello, Utah, in November 1997. After being pushed rapidly to completion, it was dedicated only eight months later on July 26, 1998. The second of these temples, at Anchorage, Alaska, came about six months after, and the Colonia Juárez México Chihuahua Temple was dedicated about a year later in 1999.
These original three small temples had a floor area of about seven thousand square feet and included just one room for presenting the endowment. This meant that a new session could begin only every two hours. These buildings also included a celestial room, one sealing room, and a font for baptisms.
Beginning with the Columbus Ohio Temple, which commenced construction in April 1998, the plan was enlarged to about eleven thousand square feet. It added another sealing room, a second endowment instruction room, and some other facilities which enabled the temple to function more efficiently. Now sessions could begin about every hour and fifteen minutes. With the announcement of the Columbus temple as well as temples in such locations as St. Paul, Spokane, Detroit, and Edmonton, it was apparent that these smaller structures would not only serve Saints in small, isolated areas but that they would be built in some larger centers of Church population as well.
|Spokane Washington Temple represented a slightly enlarged plan. Courtesy of Tyler Nebeker.||The Columbia River Washington Temple began the third group of the small temples. © 2008 Intellectual Reserve, Inc.|
A third group of these smaller temples, beginning in 2001 with the Columbia River temple in Washington State, enlarged the plan to about sixteen thousand square feet. This further enhanced their efficiency.
The Saints regarded some of these smaller temples as specific fulfillments of prophecy. Speaking at a conference in Grants Pass, Oregon, in 1924, Elder Melvin J. Ballard of the Quorum of the Twelve declared that a temple would be built one day in the Rogue River Valley. A temple was dedicated at nearby Medford in 2000. When a chapel was dedicated in a Columbus, Ohio, suburb in 1991, the stake president emphasized the importance of temple attendance (at that time, requiring an overnight drive to Washington DC) and prayed, “Help us to realize that as we attend more regularly, the temple could move closer, even to our doorsteps.” The Columbus Ohio Temple, also dedicated in 2000, was built next door to this very chapel.
There were several instances where the property that would eventually be needed had been obtained or retained even though the reason why was not known at the time. For example, when a chapel in Bismarck, North Dakota, was built at one end of an L-shaped piece of property, selling the other leg was discussed. “Each time they considered selling the land, the district presidency received strong impressions that the land should not be sold, but they did not know why.” This later became the site for a temple.
As had been the case in the colonies, the Saints were blessed as they participated in, or even just witnessed, the construction of their temple. In the southeastern United States, the Young Women set goals to be sealed in the temple as they helped assemble crystals in temple chandeliers. In Detroit, Michigan, as Primary children looked out the window to the temple being built next door, they often sang “I Love to See the Temple,” and eventually saved enough pennies to contribute two hundred dollars to the temple fund.
Developments in temple building worldwide were reflected by specific developments in Mexico.
Smaller Temples Announced by President Hinckley after Colonia Juárez
First Group: About 7,000 square feet Announced Dedicated
53. Monticello Utah* October 4, 1997 July 26, 1998
54. Anchorage Alaska* October 4, 1997 January 9, 1999
55. Colonia Juárez Chihuahua México October 4, 1997 March 6, 1999
Second Group: About 11,000 square feet Announced Dedicated
59. Spokane Washington August 13, 1998 August 21, 1999
60. Columbus Ohio April 25, 1998 September 4, 1999
61. Bismarck North Dakota July 29, 1998 September 19, 1999
62. Columbia South Carolina September 11, 1998 October 16, 1999
63. Detroit Michigan August 10, 1998 October 23, 1999
64. Halifax Nova Scotia May 7, 1998 November 14, 1999
65. Regina Saskatchewan August 3, 1998 November 14, 1999
67. Edmonton Alberta August 11, 1998 December 11, 1999
68. Raleigh North Carolina September 3, 1998 December 18, 1999
69. St Paul Minnesota July 29, 1998 January 9, 2000
70. Kona Hawaii May 7, 1998 January 23, 2000
71. Ciudad Juárez México May 7, 1998 February 26, 2000
72. Hermosillo Sonora México July 20, 1998 February 27, 2000
74. Oaxaca México February 23, 1999 March 11, 2000
75. Tuxtla Gutiérrez México February 25, 1999 March 12, 2000
76. Louisville Kentucky March 17, 1999 March 19, 2000
77. Palmyra New York February 21, 1999 April 6, 2000
78. Fresno California January 8, 1999 April 9, 2000
79. Medford Oregon March 15, 1999 April 16, 2000
80. Memphis Tennessee September 17, 1998 April 23, 2000
81. Reno Nevada April 12, 1999 April 23, 2000
83. Tampico México July 8, 1998 May 20, 2000
84. Nashville Tennessee*** November 9, 1994 May 21, 2000
85. Villahermosa México October 30, 1998 May 21, 2000
86. Montréal Québec August 6, 1998 June 4, 2000
87. San José Costa Rica March 17, 1999 June 4, 2000
88. Fukuoka Japan May 7, 1998 June 11, 2000
89. Adelaide Australia March 17, 1999 June 15, 2000
90. Melbourne Australia October 30, 1998 June 16, 2000
91. Suva Fiji May 7, 1998 June 18, 2000
92. Mérida México September 25, 1998 July 8, 2000
93. Veracruz México April 14, 1999 July 9, 2000
94. Baton Rouge Louisiana October 14, 1998 July 16, 2000
95. Oklahoma City Oklahoma March 14, 1999 July 30, 2000
96. Caracas Venezuela** September 30, 1995 August 20, 2000
98. Birmingham Alabama September 11, 1998 September 3, 2000
103. Montevideo Uruguay November 2, 1998 March 18, 2001
105. Guadalajara México April 14, 1999 April 29, 2001
106. Perth Australia June 11, 1999 May 20, 2001
102. Porto Alegre Brazil September 30, 1997 December 17, 2000
104. Winter Quarters Nebraska** June 14, 1999 April 22, 2001
108. Snowflake Arizona** April 2, 2000 March 3, 2002
112. Asunción Paraguay April 2, 2000 May 19, 2002
115. Brisbane Australia July 20, 1998 June 15, 2003
121. Aba Nigeria April 2, 2000 August 7, 2005
Third Group: About 17,000–19,000 sq. ft. Announced Dedicated
107. Columbia River Washington April 2, 2000 November 18, 2001
110. Monterrey México**** December 21, 1995 April 28, 2002
120. San Antonio Texas June 24, 2001 May 22, 2005
122. Newport Beach California April 21, 2001 August 28, 2005
(22.) Apia Samoa (rebuilt) July 16, 2003 September 4, 2005
123. Sacramento California April 21, 2001 September 3, 2006
124. Helsinki Finland April 2, 2000 October 22, 2006
109. Lubbock Texas April 2, 2000 April 21, 2002
114. The Hague Netherlands August 16, 1999 September 8, 2002
117. Accra Ghana February 16, 1998 January 11, 2004
116. Redlands California April 21, 2001 September 14, 2003
126. Curitiba, Brazil August 23, 2002 June 6, 2008
133. Vancouver British Columbia***** May 25, 2006 August 4, 2007
Temple Announced Ground Broken
127. Panamá City Panamá August 23, 2002 August 10, 2008
131. Kyiv Ukraine July 20, 1998 June 23, 2007
132. Cebu Philippines April 18, 2006 November 14, 2007
134. Tegucigalpa Honduras June 9, 2006 June 9, 2007
135. Quetzaltenango Guatemala December 16, 2006
136. Manaus Brazil May 23, 2007 June 20, 2008
137. San Salvador El Salvador November 18, 2007 September 20, 2008
Gila Valley Arizona April 26, 2008
Gilbert Arizona April 26, 2008
Phoenix Arizona May 25, 2008
* Later remodeled and enlarged.
** Slightly larger two-story versions of this group.
*** Announced before, but plans changed since Colonia Juárez.
**** Announced earlier, but the design changed after 1997.
***** These are groundbreaking dates, not dedications.
The First Temple in Mexico
Elder Spencer W. Kimball’s 1947 vision of a temple in Mexico (see chapter 1) would be realized not immediately but over a third of a century later. The temple at Colonia Juárez was not the first in Mexico; this milestone had actually been achieved at Mexico City sixteen years earlier, when, appropriately, Spencer W. Kimball was President of the Church.
Ever since endowments were given in Spanish at the Arizona temple beginning in 1945, faithful Saints in Mexico had wondered if it would ever be possible to have a temple in their own land. Under the Mexican Constitution of 1917, churches were able to function, but they were not legally recognized and did not have the right to own property. The law required that their property be held by the Mexican government and that all government buildings be open to the public. Latter-day Saints supposed that it would be impossible for a sacred temple to function under those circumstances. Approval to build a temple came only following three and a half years of sensitive negotiations between Church and government leaders. On one occasion, President Kimball personally met with Mexico’s president, José López Portillo. Negotiation became easier because Mexican officials had come to recognize the Latter-day Saints as a people committed to complying with the laws of the land.
On March 21, 1976, at a meeting of stake presidents, regional representatives, and mission presidents from Mexico and Central America, the First Presidency announced the long-awaited news: the Lord had directed that a temple be built in Mexico. Designed by Emil B. Fetzer, Church architect, the new temple would feature “a modern adaptation of original Mayan architectural styles.” The unique A-framed base of the 140-foot tower featured arched openings, inspired by Mayan doorways, through which the sky could be seen. The exterior would be covered with white cast stone, the upper two-thirds of the surface being highly ornamented. Government officials were pleased with this indigenous-looking design, which distinguished the temple from the churches of other denomination. After its completion, the temple would be one of three buildings to receive an international award for its artistic use of precast concrete.
|The México City México Temple|
The Mexico City México Temple would be the largest ever built by the Church outside of the United States and the fifth-largest among all the temples. Its 116,000-square-foot interior would include four ordinance rooms, each seating 120 persons. A unique innovation was providing one foyer where people in street clothes would present their temple recommends and a separate foyer where those dressed in white clothing would proceed up the escalators to the ordinance rooms.
A concern for the architects was the unstable land in the area. Because the site of Mexico City was once a lake, the ground did not provide a firm foundation; tests revealed that the soil at the temple site was 86 percent water. Many buildings in the city had actually tilted as they settled. To prevent the temple from doing so, a floating foundation system needed to be provided; 221 pilings would be capped by a control head connected to the foundation by steel straps which would adjust “over the years to keep the building level.”
Ground was finally broken on November 25, 1979, under the direction of Elder Boyd K. Packer of the Council of the Twelve, who also offered the prayer dedicating the site in Spanish. More than nine thousand attended the one-hour service, many having camped out overnight at the site in order to secure a favorable vantage point. Saints in the Mexico City area formed a choir of six hundred voices to provide music for the occasion.
Despite widespread poverty, the 242,000 Saints in the Mexico City temple district raised the remarkable total of $1.5 million needed for the temple’s construction. Some sold family heirlooms while others sacrificed their livelihood by dedicating crops to the temple. Because of the scarcity of heavy equipment, most of the construction was accomplished by hand.
Following its completion, the new temple was open to the public November 9–19, 1983. The fact that some 120,000 visited the temple during this period was remarkable because media coverage was limited, and most of the invitations came by word of mouth. After the tour, one visitor asked if he might bring some friends. The next day he came with a group of twenty-nine. He then asked if he could return the following day with a hundred. Another group of forty-seven young men training to become priests spent an hour and a half at the visitors’ center after the regular tour. Other visitors included some five thousand business, civic, and government leaders. Typically these professional people “entered with a nonchalant attitude but left deeply impressed by the sanctity of the temple.”
The cornerstone was placed and the temple dedicated on December 2, 1983, by Gordon B. Hinckley, Second Counselor in the First Presidency. Some forty thousand Saints attended the nine dedicatory sessions extending over a period of three days. Several speakers referred to the temple’s dedication as a fulfillment of Book of Mormon promises of great latter-day blessings to the descendants of Lehi. “Bless thy Saints in this great land and those from other lands who will use the temple,” petitioned President Hinckley in the dedicatory prayer. “Most have in their veins the blood of Father Lehi. Thou hast kept thine ancient promise. Many thousands ‘that walked in darkness have seen a great light.’” Some speakers referred to Elder Spencer W. Kimball’s dream in 1947 of a temple in Mexico. It was at the dedication that Elder Ezra Taft Benson was prompted to stress a theme that would become one of the hallmarks of his presidency: “As I participated in the Mexico City Temple dedication, I received the distinct impression that God is not pleased with our neglect of the Book of Mormon.”
David Treviño, a young man living in Mexico City at the time, had a special experience as he sang with one of the dedication choirs. He had wondered why the “Hosanna Anthem” was in the Spanish hymnal because there had never been a temple dedicated in that language. “I learned to love that anthem,” he reflected. His forty-member choir stood in two rows behind the General Authorities on the stand. “As we began to sing the ‘Hosanna Anthem,’” he recalled, “we started to choke up because of the strong emotions, yet we did our best to keep singing. The words of the anthem had a very strong meaning at the time. As we continued to sing, I could hear a rather large group singing behind us. I even looked back a couple of times just to find myself staring at the wall. I offered a silent prayer of gratitude for the help sent to our little choir. I just accepted the fact that angels were indeed helping us, since they were also rejoicing with us on this historic day. As we continued to sing, I heard the choir behind us getting larger and larger.” Later, as a member of the Mormon Youth Chorus, he had the opportunity to sing with the Tabernacle Choir, which he likened in volume and quality to the unseen singers at the Mexico City Temple dedication.
While the temple was under construction, there was a renewed emphasis on genealogical research. Many Saints wanted to do temple work for their own family members rather than for persons randomly identified through name extraction.
The temple had an even broader impact on the Saints’ spirituality and faithfulness. During the period of construction, tithe paying increased threefold, and four times as many people held temple recommends as before.
The temple ordinances had a profound effect on those who were worthy to receive them. “It is always a sweet experience when a family of converts comes to the temple to be sealed for time and all eternity,” reflected Agricol Lozano, the Church’s longtime attorney who became the Mexico City temple president in the 1990s. “However, the sealing of a husband and wife from the group of people often classified as ‘field workers’ is a particularly sweet, tender and beautiful experience.” Such individuals may “have never been the center of attention. . . . The wife perhaps in the past felt a tinge of envy as she saw a bride adorned for a formal wedding because life never gave her the opportunity to do more than dream of wearing such clothing.” Upon entering the temple, however, they are “respected and are the subject of great tenderness.” Dressed in exquisite white, she and her husband kneel at the altar in the beautiful sealing room. During the sacred ordinance, they are promised supernal and unimaginably wonderful blessings. In most cases, President Lozano continued, these potential kings and queens in the kingdom of heaven then “stand and embrace, leaning their heads on each other’s shoulders, weeping.”
In 1995 President Lozano stated that “more members are coming to the temple, and they are better prepared than ever before.” Many stakes, even those at some distance from the temple, brought groups that were self-sufficient, with individuals who could serve as temple officiators. On one Saturday morning he saw as many as thirty-five buses in the parking lot. The youth were also faithful in performing baptisms for the dead, often early in the morning before school; on one occasion there were seventy in the temple at 5 a.m. By this time the temple block included a complex of other church buildings: a mission office, a distribution center, a missionary training center, apartments, a meetinghouse, a visitors’ center, a family history center, and microfilm vaults.
More Temples in Mexico
A significant change took place in Mexican law as a new constitution removed many of the restrictions formerly placed on churches. On June 29, 1993, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints was officially registered by the Mexican government and, like other churches, was given such privileges as the right to own property. This opened the way for a significant expansion of temple building. The Colonia Juárez Chihuahua Temple, dedicated in 1999, became the second in Mexico and one of the original three small temples. In subsequent years, the other two were remodeled and enlarged, so the temple in the colonies is the only one remaining with the original plan.
The year 2000 represented a milestone in temple construction both in Mexico and throughout the world. The intense pace of dedicating these temples prompted the prophet to delegate some of this responsibility to his counselors. Often, two dedications in a given area were scheduled on the same weekend to cut down on travel. These patterns were reflected in Mexico, where the number of temples in operation soared from two to ten during this momentous year. The first two, Ciudad Juárez and Hermosillo, were dedicated by President Gordon B. Hinckley during a single weekend in February. The next two, Oaxaca and Tuxtla Gutiérrez, were dedicated by President James E. Faust on a weekend in March. The remaining four—Tampico, Villahermosa, Mérida, and Veracruz—were dedicated by President Thomas S. Monson on weekends in May and July. They all belonged to the slightly larger group of small temples. They could be constructed in about one year. In fact, two of them, Oaxaca and Tuxtla Gutiérrez, were actually completed in less than a year’s time, as Colonia Juárez had been.
|The Tuxtla Gutiérrez México Temple|
While the Colonia Juárez temple was still under construction, the two other temples in northern Mexico were announced, at Ciudad Juárez (in Chihuahua about 180 miles northeast of Colonia Juárez), and Hermosillo (in Sonora, the state just west of Chihuahua). David Wills, who had been project manager at Colonia Juárez, was assigned to supervise the construction of both of these new temples.
The temple in Ciudad Juárez truly is international, serving Saints in two countries. It was located there rather than in the neighboring city of El Paso, Texas, because United States citizens could enter Mexico much more easily than people from Mexico could cross the border into the US. At the groundbreaking, Elder Eran A. Call, President of the Mexico North Area, observed, “In this temple district, we have members on both sides of the border. This will bring a uniting and joining of members of both communities.” A year later, the temple was completed and ready for its public open house. Over twenty-five thousand attended. Many commented on how the temple was an oasis of peace in striking contrast to the bustle of this large border city. One professional man commented, “I don’t need to die to see heaven. This is heaven.” Another added, “If all the people in this city could come here and feel what I feel, Ciudad Juárez would be a much better city.”
|The Ciudad Juárez México Temple|
John Hart, editor of the Church News, noted that Saints from both sides of the border gathered for the cornerstone ceremony and dedication. “Stake members from Ciudad Juárez, Mexico, and El Paso, Texas, who worked together on last-minute details, sang together in the choirs.” As the temple went into service, El Paso sisters crossed the border to help Mexican Relief Society members make their own temple slippers. Richard and Bon Adelle Skidmore, the temple construction missionaries who had been reassigned to Ciudad Juárez following the completion of their assignment in the colonies, summed up their feelings: “We feel like there has been more than a temple built here. We have witnessed a mingling of cultures and a sharing of ideas.”
When President Gordon B. Hinckley was visiting with Elders Eran A. Call and Jerald L. Taylor just prior to his landmark announcement of small temples, he hinted to them that a temple would also be built in Hermosillo, the capital of the northwestern Mexican state of Sonora. Then in March 1998, immediately following the Colonia Juárez groundbreaking, Elder Call met President Hinckley for a weeklong tour of the Mexico North Area. Their first stop was in Hermosillo. The prophet looked over Church property adjacent to the Hermosillo Pitic Stake Center and then attended a meeting with the Saints where he promised them that “they would have a temple in their city.” The official announcement that a temple would be built on this site came about four months later.
Members immediately set to work to beautify the generally unattractive street that passed in front of the temple site. Workmen sometimes asked supervisors from the Church why the standards for the temple construction were so high. They came to appreciate that they were involved in a very special project; some took the missionary discussions and were baptized. As the building was completed, local members, like the Saints in the colonies, contributed many hours to create beautiful gardens around the temple which were appreciated by the neighbors. During the temple’s open house, the hours needed to be extended, sometimes until midnight, because of the great interest; many visitors left with tears in their eyes because of the special spirit they felt in the temple.
A temple in Tampico was built at about this same time. The Church had acquired property in Tampico, Mexico, where a stake center and school were built. In 1982 the school closed, and some wanted to sell that portion of the land. Stake president Roberto de Leon Perales resisted, declaring, “One day, a temple will be built here.” The Tampico temple now stands on that plot of land.
|The Tampíco México Temple|
Over the years, the Mexican Saints had sacrificed to make the long trips needed to reach a temple. Even in Hermosillo, which was relatively close to the Mesa Arizona temple, crossing the international border and paying for the trip posed challenges. For example, Puricación Segovia, a blind lady, went from house to house doing laundry in order to raise money for the trip to the temple. Saints from central and southern Mexico had made even greater sacrifices as it sometimes required days rather than just hours to reach the nearest temple. The Emilio García family from Guadalajara used all their funds simply for the cost of going to Mesa with nothing left over for food; they were very grateful therefore when some thoughtful Saints in the border city of Nogales gave them some sandwiches. Years later, Brother García would become the first president of the Guadalajara México Temple.
|The Guadalajara México Temple|
Those living in southeastern Mexico needed to travel even longer distances. Saints from Mérida in the Yucatan would spend four days traveling to reach Arizona, four days doing temple work, and an additional four days to return home, making these excursions nearly two weeks in length. Even after the Mexico City temple opened, they traveled hundreds of miles to get there. The Guatemala City temple was actually closer to Mérida, but the Saints there would need to cross mountains, jungles, and an international border, so they preferred to make the 1,000-mile trip to Mexico City. Celia Carillo remembered seeing mice scurrying across the floor of the train from Mérida bound for the Mexican capital. She recalled another trip when their chartered bus lost control in a remote area and crashed into a ravine. Though many were “bloodied and bruised,” there were no serious injuries. As they crawled out of the bus, they encountered three bandits who had been following the bus, apparently with the intent of ambushing it and robbing the passengers. When they saw the injured men, women, and children, they left without harming them. The Saints discussed the advisability of returning to Mérida but determined to continue on to the temple.
|The Mérida México Temple|
During the eighteen-hour trip from Tuxtla Gutiérrez, five-year-old Íngrid Fabiola Martínez Barredo and other primary children sang their favorite hymns such as “Count Your Blessings” and “I Am a Child of God.” Adults in the group thanked the children for helping them pass the hours so enjoyably. While Íngrid was waiting to be sealed to her parents, she helped the temple workers in the nursery care for the smaller children and babies. Two years later, when their own temple was dedicated in Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Íngrid enthusiastically pointed it out to all of her acquaintances as the place “where dads and moms can be married for eternity” and “where families can be sealed together forever.”
As workmen realized that they were building a sacred house for the Lord, they often took particular pride in their work. Jay Erekson, project manager for the temple in Oaxaca, declared, “We set an entirely new standard in quality for buildings in Mexico by building these temples the way we have built them. In recent history, there has never been anything like them in terms of the quality of workmanship achieved.”
Temple builders on various occasions were convinced that they had been protected from the forces of nature. Because the Oaxaca temple was in an earthquake-prone area, its foundation was built on a system of pilings as had been done at Mexico City. When the temple was nearing completion, a 7.6-magnitude earthquake struck and lasted for three minutes. “I saw the building shake,” reported Jay Erekson. “The tower was whipping back and forth about a yard and I watched the windows going in and out of plumb.” He described how the ground in front of temple “seemed to rise in waves eight inches high.” Although over one hundred other buildings in the area were destroyed, the temple remained “perfectly square and undamaged.”
|The Oaxaca México Temple|
A fast-moving thunderstorm approached as men were working on the roof of the Hermosillo temple. They were concerned for their safety. A bolt of lightning struck a nearby wooden power pole, but the temple was not hit even though its metal tower was much taller, allowing all the men to get off the roof safely. “It was a miracle,” a local priesthood leader gratefully acknowledged. Lightning was also a concern at Veracruz when the figure of Moroni was placed atop the temple’s tower. “It had been raining steadily . . . but as we prepared to raise the angel, it immediately stopped raining. Once the statue was in position, the rain began to fall again.”
Although these temples were built on the same basic plan, some architectural details and interior finishing gave each of them a unique character. In some of them, the first of the two ordinance rooms featured murals depicting local landscapes.
As the temples neared completion, “the whole mood in the temple changed,” noticed Brother Erekson. “Prior to that time, guys would yell down the hall to each other and run back and forth. But once the furnishings were in, and the workers noticed the paintings of the Savior on the wall, the mood of all the workers changed. Without any instigation, they began to walk, not run, and they would talk only in a whisper. It was something that came from inside of them.”
Even though the Monterrey temple was the second announced for Mexico (in 1995), it was the twelfth to be dedicated (in 2002). Stiff opposition and legal battles followed the announcement of plans to build a temple. Finally, a new site was selected “in an area of Monterrey surrounded by greenery and the city’s dramatic mountain peaks.” Located in one of Mexico’s largest cities, this temple was one of the larger of the small temple plans, with a floor area of 16,500 square feet. The temple’s open house attracted much favorable attention for the Church. “We’ve waited seven years for this temple,” reflected Leticia Villagrana de Becerra when the temple was dedicated on April 28, 2002. Elder Eran A. Call, who by this time had been released as a member of the Second Quorum of the Seventy, became the temple’s first president.
As had been the case in Colonia Juárez, these other small temples also had a motivating impact on the Saints. In Tampico, for example, many less-active members were prompted to become more faithful as they observed their fellow Saints sacrificing to attend the temple. Church leaders in these other areas echoed the desire of Meredith Romney that the Saints develop the habit of attending the temple more regularly. Following the dedication of the Villahermosa México Temple, Elder Richard E. Turley Sr. first counselor of the Mexico South Area presidency, instructed the Saints that they “must now develop within their homes a culture of temple attendance and participation. It is our hope that every member home in the temple district will eventually have a picture of the temple to remind them and their children of the opportunities that can be theirs. If you are faithful, the spirituality of the members will increase. There will be a measurable impact on the whole community through the faithfulness of the people and the beauty of the temple and its surroundings.”
Some Larger Temples Still Being Built
Rexburg Idaho Temple (2008), one of the
larger temples still being built by the Church.
© Intellectual Reserve, Inc.
In 1997 when President Hinckley announced plans to build smaller temples, he added, “In areas of greater Church membership we will build more of the traditional temples, but we are developing plans that will reduce the costs without any reduction in terms of the work to be performed therein.”
|Temples in Nauvoo (2002), Copenhagen and Manhattan (both 2004) represent unique types of temples. © Intellectual Reserve, Inc.|
Two temples announced for regions of large Church membership, one in the southern part of the Salt Lake Valley and another in Rexburg, Idaho, would have areas of about 57,000 square feet. Some others would be of unique types: Nauvoo, a historic temple rebuilt; Copenhagen, an existing chapel remodeled into a temple; and Manhattan, temple facilities occupying only part of an existing structure.
Although they would serve significant numbers of Church members, these temples were relatively few. The vast majority of temples built during the decade following President Hinckley’s 1997 announcement were constructed after the pattern revealed to the prophet following his visit to the colonies. Thus the Colonia Juárez Chihuahua Temple stands as a monument to the revelation which has blessed millions of Latter-day Saints around the earth.
[Chart] Larger Temples Initiated Since Colonia Juárez
Temples Announced Dedicated
66. Billings Montana August 31, 1996 November 20, 1999
97. Houston Texas September 30, 1997 August 26, 2000
100. Boston Massachusetts September 30, 1995 October 1, 2000
113. Nauvoo Illinois (rebuilt) April 3, 1999 June 27, 2002
118. Copenhagen Denmark March 17, 1999 May 23, 2004
119. Manhattan New York August 7, 2002 June 13, 2004
125. Rexburg Idaho December 12, 2003 February 10, 2008
128. Twin Falls Idaho October 2, 2004 August 24, 2008
129. Draper Utah October 2, 2004 March 20, 2009
130. Oquirrh Mountain Utah* October 1, 2005 December 16, 2006
* Groundbreaking dates for temples not yet dedicated.
 In Conference Report, October 1997, 68–69; see also Ensign, November 1997, 49–50.
 “Promise Fulfilled,” Church News, November 6, 1999, 16.
> Chad Hawkins, The First 100 Temples (Salt Lake City: Eagle Gate, 2001), 164.
 Hawkins, First 100 Temples, 167.
 Hawkins, First 100 Temples, 175.
 Edward L. Kimball, Lengthen Your Stride: The Presidency of Spencer W. Kimball (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 2005), 365.
 Agricol Lozano, Historia de la Iglesia en México (Mexico City: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 1980), 179–81.
 Church News, April 3, 1976, 2.
 “Work to Begin on New Temple in Mexico City,” Church News, September 1, 1979, 3.
 Lozano, Historia de la Iglesia, 176–77.
 Church News, May 26, 1985, 6.
 “Modern Construction of Ancient Design,” Church News, April 25, 1981, 3; “Obra Del Mes: El Templo Mormón,” Obras, December 1983, 11–18, ff.
 “Ground Broken for Temple,” Church News, December 15, 1979, 4.
 “Mexico City Temple Visited by 120,000,” Church News, December 4, 1983, 3.
 “Mexico Temple: Fulfillment of Ancient Prophecy,” Church News, December 11, 1983, 4.
 Church News, December 11, 1983, 3; For a description of Elder Kimball’s vision, see Richard O. Cowan, The Latter-day Saint Century (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1999), 154.
 In Conference Report, October 1984, 4–5.
 David Treviño, statement to Richard Cowan, November 2007.
 Hawkins, First 100 Temples, 77.
 Agricol Lozano, “In Many Countries, Great Efforts Made to Attend the Temple,” Church News, June 25, 1994.
 John L. Hart, “Spirituality of Patrons at Mexico City Temple Making a Lasting Impact,” Church News, April 22, 1995, 12; John L. Hart, “Gospel’s Influence Spreads from Temple,” Church News, June 24, 1995, 8.
 John L. Hart, “Mexico Formally Registers Church,” Church News, July 17, 1993, 3.
 “Temple in Ciudad Juarez Unites LDS Communities Both in Mexico and U.S.,” Church News, January 23, 1999, 11.
 John L. Hart, “Temple Is an Island of Calm in Bustling City,” Church News, March 4, 2000, 11.
 Hart, “Island of Calm,” 3.
 Hawkins, First 100 Temples, 195.
 Brenton Yorgason, Two Fond Hearts: The Eran A. and Katherine G. Call Story (Provo, UT: Lighthouse Publishers, 2006), 327.
 Hawkins, First 100 Temples, 197–98.
 Jason Swenson, “Sacred Hill Now Site of Tampico Temple,” Church News, May 27, 2000, 4.
 Jason Swenson, “New Temple a Sacred Blessing, Responsibility,” Church News, May 5, 2001, 3; see also Jason Swenson, “Guadalajara: Building Traditions of Faith,” Church News, June 23, 2001, 9–10.
 Jason Swenson, “Modern Temple Rises among Mayan Ruins,” Church News, July 15, 2000, 4; Hawkins, First 100 Temples, 246–247.
 Marvin Gardner, “Íngrid Fabiola Martínez Barredo of Tuxtla Gutiérrez, México,” Friend, May 2002, 39.
 Swenson, “Modern Temple Rises,” 3.
 John L. Hart, “New Horizons Open for a Faithful People,” Church News, March 18, 2000, 4.
 Hawkins, First 100 Temples, 198.
 Hawkins, First 100 Temples, 249.
 Hawkins, First 100 Temples, 202.
 Jason Swenson, “Patience Rewarded in Monterrey,” Church News, May 11, 2002, 3–4.
 Hawkins, First 100 Temples, 226.
 Hawkins, First 100 Temples, 231.